Hundreds of healthcare workers have died of coronavirus. These ...

General OB/GYN

The material on this site is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by a qualified health care provider.© 2005–2022 MedPage Today, LLC, a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved.Medpage Today is among the federally registered trademarks of MedPage Today, LLC and may not be used by third parties without explicit permission.

'One Big Misunderstanding': OB-GYN Denies Sexual Misconduct Allegations

A Las Vegas OB-GYN accused of sexual misconduct with three patients questioned one of his accusers face-to-face during an administrative hearing by a state medical licensing board.

But first, during his opening remarks, Dr. George Chambers said, "It is my hope that you will see that this has been one big misunderstanding, one that has tarnished my once stellar reputation and has cost me dearly."

The physician was without an attorney and represented himself at the hearing of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners.

Chambers said there was nothing improper about the manner in which he examined one patient and offered two others $1,000 apiece to model nude for advertisements for his cosmetic gynecology specialty.

But an attorney for the board said that the doctor's conduct with patients was humiliating and demeaning.

"He fundamentally disregarded the boundaries between physician and patient," said Brandee Mooneyhan, the board's deputy general counsel.

According to a complaint by a board investigative committee, Chambers "repeatedly exploited his relationships with patients and violated patients' trust by engaging in sexual improprieties that constitute sexual misconduct."

He is accused of disruptive behavior; engaging in conduct intended to deceive; failure to maintain accurate medical records; engaging in conduct that violates the trust of a patient and exploits the relationship with the patient for financial or other personal gain; continual failure to practice medicine properly; and disreputable conduct.

One of the first witnesses was Patient A in the complaint, who saw Chambers for a torn perineum resulting from childbirth.

The patient testified that on her first and only visit, Chambers used a slang expression to inform her that he had tried to insert his entire hand in her vagina. He also used the patient's cellphone to document him inserting four fingers, without a nurse or other staff member present, she said. He asked her to text him two other photos for his records.

When questioned by the board's attorney, Chambers said he could not recall if he used the slang term "because it's not part of my language." But he said he did use nonmedical terms with some patients.

He said he kept photos of patients confidential by keeping them on a secure iPad in a safe to which only he has the combination.

Patient A testified that for weeks after the exam she was in a lot of pain. During the exam, she told Chambers at one point that it was "very uncomfortable," she said.

She testified that she didn't see the doctor for a "cosmetic fix" and that the various aesthetic surgeries he proposed undermined her confidence.

"I was humiliated," she said. "I didn't want my husband to know about my body and what was supposedly wrong with it."

In questioning Patient A, Chambers asked her if she had screamed during the exam, and she said no. He also questioned her about their "jovial conversation" following the exam, where the patient did not complain of pain.

"I know what happened was wrong," the patient said. "I know what had happened was sexual assault."

In his opening remarks, Chambers said there were "countless examples" of his good deeds as a physician, including helping victims of sexual trafficking.

"I am not the monster that they want you to believe that I am," he said.

During questioning by Mooneyhan, he acknowledged offering $1,000 to patients to pose nude for advertisements. Two such patients are expected to testify at the hearing, which continues on Wednesday.

When the hearing is completed, hearing officer Nancy Moss Ghusn will present her findings to the medical board and make recommendations regarding any disciplinary action.

Contact Mary Hynes at mhynes@reviewjournal.Com or 702-383-0336. Follow @MaryHynes1 on Twitter.

Major OBGYN Professional Group Says Role Of Abortion Is 'settled Science'

EXCLUSIVE — The nation's foremost professional organization for OBGYNs told a group of anti-abortion doctors that support for abortion in the profession was not up for debate.

The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists had invited the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to a debate at Duke University hosted by the Kenan Institute for Ethics's Civil Discourse Project on whether or not "induced abortion" should be considered to be good medical practice.

LIBERAL POLICIES ARE MAKING THE AMERICAN DREAM UNAFFORDABLE

But in a statement responding to the invitation, which was shared with Washington Examiner, the national OBGYN professional organization's CEO, Dr. Maureen Phipps, told the group of anti-abortion doctors that it "will not debate abortion as an essential part of reproductive health care.

"Rather," Phipps wrote, "we will continue to affirm that the role of abortion in our patients' lives is settled science."

In an interview with the Washington Examiner, AAPLOG CEO Dr. Christina Francis said the organization's response was notable because the foremost professional group for OBGYNs was essentially stating that support for abortion was not up for discussion in the profession, even though the vast majority of OBGYNs do not provide abortions.

"Stating that this is settled science ignores the fact that the vast majority of OBGYNs do not perform elective abortion," Francis said. "But it also clearly ignores the vast majority of the medical evidence out there that shows that elective abortions do not improve the health outcomes of our patients, and in many cases, actively worsen the health outcomes. What ACOG is trying to do is make it appear that all OBGYNs feel this way, when that's very clearly not the case."

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists did not respond to a series of questions from the Washington Examiner about what the organization considers to be settled science or if it believes that doctors who oppose abortion have a place in the profession.

The organization includes a guide on its website for reporters on what kind of language it should use when writing about abortion. The guide says reporters should avoid using terms such as "elective abortion" or "fetal heartbeat."

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

Francis told the Washington Examiner that someone who believes "settled science" can apply to most things in the medical field "probably need to get out of medicine.

"Saying something is settled science hearkens back to people being so confident that the Earth was flat that they considered that settled science," Francis said, "and the only way that we discovered that that wasn't the case was through someone questioning that narrative, questioning that status quo, and looking for better answers."

---